Skip to main content

Secular vs Cyclical Trend

When we look at economic, industrial, or business trends, we need to understand whether they are secular trends or cyclical trends. 

For instance, our population growth is on a declining trend. A few decades ago, population growth was above 2.0% and now it is 1.0%. There is a clear downward trend and this trend is likely to continue for at least a few more decades due to declining fertility rate, rising cost of living, growing urbanization, etc. It's a natural course of the economy. The declining trend in population growth is there for decades and looking at other indicators, it is safe to say the trend is likely to continue for at least a few more decades. It's a secular trend - a trend that sustains for a long period with greater predictability.

Now, think about the current upward trend in the interest rate. Was the trend the same 5 or 10 years back? No. It moves in cycles. In some periods, there was a downward trend, and then there was an upward trend. It is not likely to go up forever or go down forever. It's part of a cyclical trend. 

It's important to separate the trends that are secular and cyclical. We can sometimes mistake cyclical trends for secular or vice versa. For instance, if we see a business going through declining sales after a growth period, we may assume that it's cyclical. However, it may be due to a secular trend. The business's competitiveness may start deteriorating due to changes in technology that the business is unable to cope with. It may continue to lose market share to new fast-moving competitors. The declining trend in sales may not be cyclical, but rather secular. 

On the other hand, market participants can misinterpret a cyclical trend as secular trend as well where a business may face short term headwind due to macro factors which is recoverable once the cycle changes. It's important to understand the underlying reasons to figure out if the changes are secular or cyclical.

Popular posts from this blog

What Drives Stock Return

How does a stock generate return for investors? There are lots of ways to break it down, but in this article I will focus on one of the simplest breakdowns. I will borrow the Grinold-Kroner Model .  You buy a stock of a company from the exchange. You have a finite time horizon, after which you want to sell the stock in the exchange. During your holding period the price may fluctuate a lot. What matters is at what price you buy and what price you sell. In between these two points, you will receive some dividends if the company disburses some of its cash flow to the stockholders.  Now you understand, you can make money in two ways from a stock. The price appreciation, if the selling price is higher than the purchase price, and the dividend that you receive during your holding period.  Dividend: A company that generates handsome cash flows and don’t have much option to reinvest that cash, will most likely share the cash flow with the stockholders either in the form of divid...

Time Travel, Asset Valuation, and Source of Alpha

When investing in a stock or any cash-generating asset, you are betting on the future. Buying a cash-generating asset means you are trading cash for future cash flows. Michael Mauboussin calls it a form of time travel where the buyer travels into the future to see what cash flow they can get from the asset and judge if the price quoted today makes sense. The only problem with this approach is that we don’t have the time machine.  So, most of us are guessing. And the downside with the guesswork is you will be wrong a lot of the time. Even if your guess turns right, you shouldn’t credit yourself with the result. You may have factored some of the catalysts in your guesswork, and you may have missed a few. And those missed few would have altered the result that you expected had it gone the other way around.  There are too many unknowns, and we are working with probabilities of few knowable factors. It is crucial to have the humility to recognise when you're at a disadvantag...